Amber Heard’s lawyer says jury ‘influenced’ by social media frenzy and he or she ‘cannot afford’ $10m damages


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Amber Heard’s lawyer has mentioned social media posts “influenced” the jury in Johnny Depp’s lawsuit towards his former spouse, including that her consumer can’t afford the $10m (£8m) awarded in damages.

Elaine Bredehoft made the remarks a day after Depp won the high-profile case towards his ex-wife, with the court docket awarding the actor $10m in compensatory damages.

She mentioned she believes the jury couldn’t escape the extreme and “lopsided” social media frenzy surrounding the trial.

“How are you going to not? They went residence each evening. They’ve households. The households are on social media,” she instructed NBC.

“We had a 10-day break within the center due to the judicial convention. There is not any means they could not have been influenced by it,” she mentioned.

When requested if her consumer would be capable to pay the $10m in compensatory damages, Ms Bredehoft replied: “Oh no, completely not.”

Ms Bredehoft described the social media protection as “horrible”, including that she opposed having cameras within the courtroom.

“It is just like the Roman Colosseum, you recognize? How they seen this entire case,” she mentioned.

“I used to be towards cameras within the courtroom, and I went on document with that and argued towards it due to the delicate nature of this. However it made it a zoo.”

Ms Bredehoft mentioned that after the decision, Heard instructed her that she was “so sorry to all these girls on the market” and mentioned the outcome was “a setback for all girls in and outdoors the courtroom”.

She mentioned the Aquaman actor “feels the burden of that”.

The lawyer mentioned the decision sends a “horrible message”.

“Until you pull out your cellphone and also you video your partner or your important different beating you, successfully you will not be believed,” she added.

Depp had sued Heard for $50m (£38.2m) over an article printed in The Washington Submit in December 2018, wherein she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse”.

Heard‘s column didn’t point out Depp by title, however he argued it was an instance of “defamation by implication” as a result of components of the column referred to allegations of abuse she made towards him following their break-up in 2016.

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

The marketing campaign towards Amber Heard

Learn extra:
How has online abuse of Amber Heard become acceptable?

Heard had issued a counter-claim for $100m (£76.4m) over statements calling her allegations a “hoax” made by her ex-husband’s legal professional which have been printed in Mail On-line tales in 2020.

Depp was not in court docket on Wednesday, however the jury awarded him $15m (£11.9m) in damages – $10m in compensatory damages and $5m (£4m) in punitive damages.

Nevertheless Fairfax County Circuit Decide Penney Azcarate decreased the punitive damages awarded to Depp to $350,000 in keeping with the state’s authorized restrict, making his whole damages $10.4m.

Heard said she will appeal the verdict, which a court docket in Virginia delivered on Wednesday.

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.