Richard Glossip: Inmate on dying row for 25 years ‘completely harmless’, politician says – as report into case launched


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

A Republican state consultant who describes himself as a dying penalty supporter has mentioned he believes that dying row inmate Richard Glossip is harmless.

Kevin McDugle, from Oklahoma, was responding to a report by a Houston regulation agency into Glossip’s case.

He mentioned: “We have got a person sitting on dying row that has been there 25 years, and I consider he is completely harmless.”

Glossip, 59, has been convicted twice and sentenced to dying for ordering the killing of Barry Van Treese, the proprietor of a motel in Oklahoma Metropolis the place Glossip labored.

Justin Sneed, a handyman, admitted robbing and beating Mr Van Treese in January 1997, however mentioned he solely did this after Glossip provided to pay him $10,000. Sneed is serving a life sentence with out parole after pleading responsible to beating Van Treese to dying with a baseball bat in a room on the motel.

However the regulation agency Reed Smith, which produced its report for the state of Oklahoma at no cost, mentioned that necessary proof had been misplaced or destroyed in Glossip’s case.

It additionally mentioned {that a} detective had improperly requested main questions of Sneed in an effort to implicate Glossip.

Stan Perry, a lawyer with Reed Smith, mentioned: “Our conclusion is that no affordable juror, listening to the whole report, and the uncovered info… would have convicted Richard Glossip of capital homicide.”

Oklahoma state Rep. Kevin McDugle, R-Broken Arrow, speaks during a news conference Wednesday, June 16, 2021, in Oklahoma City. Pic: AP
Oklahoma state consultant Kevin McDugle. Pic: AP

Extra on Richard Glossip:
Sky News podcast series: Another Dead Man Walking – would you like to watch me die?
Death row inmate, 59, marries paralegal Lea Rodger, 32, in Oklahoma prison

The misplaced proof included monetary data that had been destroyed in late 1999 or early 2000, earlier than Glossip’s retrial and after his first conviction and dying sentence had been overturned.

These may have contradicted the prosecution’s idea that Glossip needed to cover his alleged embezzlement from the motel, the place he was supervisor, and so had Mr Van Treese killed.

The report added: “This loss or destruction of proof seems to be so important to the defence as to solid critical doubt as to the basic equity of the prison trial in opposition to Glossip.”

Mr McDugle led the push for the investigation and mentioned that, whereas “I do consider within the dying penalty”, safeguards had been wanted to guard the harmless.

He known as for Glossip to get a brand new appeals courtroom listening to, including: “If we put Richard Glossip to dying, I’ll battle on this state to abolish the dying penalty, just because the method is just not pure.”

Glossip’s lawyer Don Knight mentioned: “Within the coming days, Mr Glossip’s defence crew will file a request for a listening to with the Oklahoma Court docket of Appeals so this new proof of innocence may be examined in a courtroom of regulation.”

Oklahoma County District Legal professional David Prater, who took workplace after Glossip’s second trial and second dying sentence, mentioned he’s reviewing the report.

He has beforehand mentioned he thinks Glossip is responsible, having reviewed varied objects of proof, and that he would help a retrial for first-degree homicide and once more search the dying penalty.

Glossip was near execution in September 2015 however jail authorities had the fallacious deadly drug.

After it was revealed that the drug had been used to execute one other inmate, Oklahoma’s executions had been suspended.

They resumed in October with the execution of John Grant, who convulsed and vomited earlier than he was declared lifeless.

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.